commit 3c0ad89a139b9147cc8cc02311cc685cefd6f686 Author: Oswald Buddenhagen <o...@users.sf.net> Date: Thu Feb 10 20:27:31 2022 +0100
don't propagate about-to-be-expunged messages while we already refrained from propagating messages that would be expunged from the target, we still propagated ones that would be expunged from the source. this would lead to the weird situation of creating orphans, and would pose journal replay idempotence problems. such messages will now never have a sync record, so it becomes pointless to test for S_PENDING in the trashing loop. note that the behavior was previously bogus: these messages would have been paired by the end of the run, so we shouldn't have treated them as solo for the purposes of TrashOnlyNew/TrashRemoteNew. src/run-tests.pl | 16 ++++++++++++++++ src/sync.c | 12 +++++++----- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/run-tests.pl b/src/run-tests.pl index 68c817aa..5a96b504 100755 --- a/src/run-tests.pl +++ b/src/run-tests.pl @@ -948,10 +948,13 @@ my @x01 = ( C, "*FS", "*", "*F", D, "*", "*", "*", E, "*T", "*", "*", + F, "*", "*", "*T", G, "*F", "*", "_", H, "*FT", "*", "*", I, "_", "*", "*", + J, "*T", "", "", K, "*P", "", "", + L, "", "", "*T", M, "", "", "*", ); @@ -962,10 +965,13 @@ my @X01 = ( B, "+F", "+F", "", C, "", "+FS", "+S", E, "", "+T", "+T", + F, "+T", "+T", "", G, "+T", ">", "", H, "", "+FT", "+FT", I, "", "<", "+T", + L, "*T", "*T", "", M, "*", "*", "", + J, "", "*T", "*T", K, "", "*P", "*P", ); test("full", \@x01, \@X01, \@O01); @@ -977,9 +983,12 @@ my @X02 = ( B, "+F", "+F", "", C, "", "+FS", "+S", E, "/", "/", "/", + F, "/", "/", "/", G, "/", "/", "", H, "/", "/", "/", I, "", "/", "/", + J, "/", "", "", + L, "", "", "/", M, "*", "*", "", K, "", "*P", "*P", ); @@ -992,9 +1001,11 @@ my @X03 = ( B, "+F", "+F", "", C, "", "+FS", "+S", E, "", ">+T", "/", + F, "+T", ">+T", "/", G, "+T", ">", "", H, "", ">+T", "/", I, "", "/", "/", + L, "", "", "/", M, "*", "*", "", K, "", "*P", "*P", ); @@ -1008,6 +1019,7 @@ my @X04 = ( E, "", "+T", "+T", H, "", "+FT", "+FT", I, "", "<", "+T", + J, "", "*T", "*T", K, "", "*P", "*P", ); test("pull", \@x01, \@X04, \@O04); @@ -1019,6 +1031,7 @@ my @X05 = ( B, "+F", "+F", "", C, "", "+FS", "+S", E, "", "+T", "+T", + F, "+T", "+T", "", H, "", "+FT", "+FT", ); test("flags", \@x01, \@X05, \@O05); @@ -1034,7 +1047,9 @@ test("deletions", \@x01, \@X06, \@O06); my @O07 = ("", "", "Sync New\n"); my @X07 = ( M, 0, K, + L, "*T", "*T", "", M, "*", "*", "", + J, "", "*T", "*T", K, "", "*P", "*P", ); test("new", \@x01, \@X07, \@O07); @@ -1044,6 +1059,7 @@ my @X08 = ( I, 0, I, B, "+F", "+F", "", C, "", "+F", "", + F, "+T", "+T", "", I, "", "<", "+T", ); test("push flags + pull deletions", \@x01, \@X08, \@O08); diff --git a/src/sync.c b/src/sync.c index 0ec8022b..4a467854 100644 --- a/src/sync.c +++ b/src/sync.c @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ box_opened2( sync_vars_t *svars, int t ) } opts[t^1] |= OPEN_OLD; } - if (chan->ops[t] & OP_EXPUNGE) // Don't propagate doomed msgs + if ((chan->ops[t] | chan->ops[t^1]) & OP_EXPUNGE) // Don't propagate doomed msgs opts[t^1] |= OPEN_FLAGS; } if (chan->ops[t] & OP_EXPUNGE) { @@ -1155,8 +1155,10 @@ box_loaded( int sts, message_t *msgs, int total_msgs, int recent_msgs, void *aux debug( "unpropagated old message %u\n", tmsg->uid ); if (srec->status & S_UPGRADE) { - if ((svars->chan->ops[t] & OP_EXPUNGE) && - ((srec->pflags | srec->aflags[t]) & ~srec->dflags[t] & F_DELETED)) { + if (((svars->chan->ops[t] & OP_EXPUNGE) && + ((srec->pflags | srec->aflags[t]) & ~srec->dflags[t] & F_DELETED)) || + ((svars->chan->ops[t^1] & OP_EXPUNGE) && + ((srec->msg[t^1]->flags | srec->aflags[t^1]) & ~srec->dflags[t^1] & F_DELETED))) { // We can't just kill the entry, as we may be propagating flags // (in particular, F_DELETED) towards the real message. // No dummy is actually present, but pretend there is, so the @@ -1202,7 +1204,7 @@ box_loaded( int sts, message_t *msgs, int total_msgs, int recent_msgs, void *aux svars->newmaxuid[t^1] = tmsg->uid; JLOG( "+ %u %u", (srec->uid[F], srec->uid[N]), "fresh" ); } - if ((svars->chan->ops[t] & OP_EXPUNGE) && (tmsg->flags & F_DELETED)) { + if (((svars->chan->ops[t] | svars->chan->ops[t^1]) & OP_EXPUNGE) && (tmsg->flags & F_DELETED)) { // Yes, we may nuke fresh entries, created only for newmaxuid tracking. // It would be lighter on the journal to log a (compressed) skip, but // this rare case does not justify additional complexity. @@ -1661,7 +1663,7 @@ msgs_flags_set( sync_vars_t *svars, int t ) debug( "is deleted dummy\n" ); continue; } - if (only_new && !(srec->status & (S_PENDING | S_DUMMY(t^1) | S_SKIPPED))) { + if (only_new && !(srec->status & (S_DUMMY(t^1) | S_SKIPPED))) { debug( "is not new\n" ); continue; } _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel