thanks for the script and clearing that up for me! Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. aug. 12., P, 9:52):
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:02:01AM +0200, Bence Ferdinandy wrote: > >- If I receive an email at t=0 and start mbsync and then receive emails > >while mbsync is still running I'm guessing those emails may or may not be > >synced depending on when exactly they arrived, but no guarantees, right? > > > correct, as documented under "inherent problems" in the manual. > > >- Would mbsync be confused if multiple instances were triggered in > >parallel? > > > no, as documented in "description" in the manual. but it won't quite do > what you want, either: > > >Basically what I'm thinking about is that if parallel running is not a > >problem, than the best and easiest would just to trigger on all incoming > >mail so I get it as fast as possible > > > that won't guarantee that you actually get the mails in a timely manner, > as the subsequent instances will just exit immediately. > > >Or are there any best practices for this? > > > i'm using the attached script, which does box-specific event compression > and allows invoking a post-sync action (i use box-specific audio > signals). > _______________________________________________ > isync-devel mailing list > isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel > -- +36305425054 bence.ferdinandy.com
_______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
