On 2024-11-20 16:05 +0100, Daniel Tameling wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24:09PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
>wrote:
>>
>> now, i'll admit that i find the verbose summary hard to parse myself, as
>> the numbers get kind of lost between the words. i just didn't have a
>> better idea ...
>>
>
>I think it would help to put all numbers at the start of the line.
>And I would prefer it if the same actions would be grouped together,
>instead of all far and near side output. Something like this:
>
>19/2 new message(s)/flag update(s) pulled,
>10/5 new message(s)/flag update(s) pushed,
>0 message(s) expunged from near side,
>3 message(s) expunged from far side.
>
>It's not very elegant, but I find it more readable.
Yeah I think I like this instinctively; it's better
organized. You'd still need the channels and mailboxes updated message
but that's a minor note.
My preference for a concise output would be something like this:
Channels: 2 Boxes: 4 Far: +13 *42 #0 -0 Near: +7 *0 #0 -0
Essentially mimicking the progress output, but it's instantly more
understandable (in my opinion) at a quick glance.
--
Akshay
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
