On 26/03/2025, 11:49, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:08:26AM +0100, inwit wrote: >>I'm observing a disturbing behaviour of mbsync, both in v1.5.0 and in >>v1.5.1. When I add the --dry-run flag, mbsync ignores it and does alter >>my mailboxes, both far and near. >> > such a bug was fixed in 1.5.1. Is it possible that in this last version it doesn't explicitly say what "would have" done in the final summary?
_______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
