On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:31:55AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via
> > isync-devel wrote:
> > > shoehorning isync into doing something it was not designed for
> >
> > What is so extreme about what I am doing?
> >
> isync's purpose is to keep both sides in sync. MaxMessages is a deviation
> from that. when you push that number down to zero, that's _literally_
> extreme, and you've gone from syncing to fetching.
Can't the requested workflow be simply scripted as:
- synchronize with isync (getting all the emails from the remote)
- move all the email to a non-synchronized folder (emptying the local)
- synchronize again (removing all emails from the remote)
--
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
People are all unique- but some are more unique than others.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #22 (Epic))
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
