Attila Lendvai wrote: > dear list, > > does anyone have any objections against pushing this: > > Set *list-end-test* to 'endp instead of 'atom, so (iter (for foo :in > something-non-list)) fails instead of silently exists > > it bit me several times and long ago i've changed it to 'endp on my > local copy. it did not cause me any headaches with any projects i use, > but i may be missing some use-cases. > > if nobody speaks up for long enough, i'll push it eventually.
ENDP sounds like a good idea. I was under the impression that iterate/for/in already failed with improper lists, but if it doesn't yet, it really should. Cheers, -- Andreas Fuchs, (http://|im:asf@|mailto:asf@)boinkor.net, antifuchs _______________________________________________ iterate-devel site list iterate-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/iterate-devel
