On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:30 AM, <joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com> wrote:
> Mirko,
>
> >Are you implying that instead of lambda forms one should define the
> >functions and use function names.
> No. Just look at the examples in the source code, incl. tests.
> The key is to write #'(lambda ...) aka. (function (lambda ...)), not
> (lambda ...)
>
Like this?
(defclause-sequence matrix-row matrix-row-index
:access-fn
#'(lambda (grid index)
(assert (and (grid:gridp grid) (eql (grid:grid-rank grid) 2))
(grid))
(grid:row grid index))
:size-fn
#'(lambda (grid)
(assert (and (grid:gridp grid) (eql (grid:grid-rank grid) 2))
(grid))
(first (grid:grid-dimensions grid)))
:element-type t :sequence-type t
:element-doc-string "(copied) rows of a matrix"
:index-doc-string "index of the rows in a matrix")
Unfortunately, that did not help improve things.
Also, the iterate documentation has an example of `defclause-sequence'
(bottom of p.26 of the pdf file). There is no #'(lambda ...), just plain
(lambda ...)
Thank you for your time,
Mirko
_______________________________________________
iterate-devel site list
iterate-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/iterate-devel
