Thanks! Sorry about the confusion. Somehow I messed up my interaction with darcs. I have caught up now.
Best, r On 4/20/17 Apr 20 -8:26 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote: > thanks for the patch Robert! > > i'm afraid you didn't have the latest version when you made your changes. > >> I'm afraid darcs is one revision control system too many for my poor >> brain (any chance of changing the iterate repo to git?), so I am >> attaching a patch file that can be applied to iterate.asd. > > it's as simple as: > > darcs get http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/darcs/iterate > > or just a darcs pull if you already have it. i'm not planning to > invest time into migrating the repo, but then i'm just one of the guys > with the commit bit. > > the format of your patch looks rather strange. what did you use to > produce it? the patch exe on my linux didn't understand it. > > could you please take a look at the latest iterate.asd and see if > anything needs to be done to it? > > i'll include it here for your convenience: > > ;;; -*- lisp -*- system definition > > (defsystem :iterate > :description "Jonathan Amsterdam's iterator/gatherer/accumulator facility" > :licence "MIT" > :in-order-to ((test-op (test-op :iterate/tests))) > :components ((:file "package") > (:file "iterate" :depends-on ("package")))) > > (defsystem :iterate/tests > :depends-on (:iterate #+sbcl :sb-rt #-sbcl :rt) > :components ((:file "iterate-test"))) > > (defmethod perform ((operation test-op) (component (eql (find-system > :iterate/tests)))) > (funcall (intern "DO-TESTS" (find-package #+sbcl "SB-RT" > #-sbcl "REGRESSION-TEST")))) > >
