Quoting Steve Appling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What does everyone think about this?
I have read your explanation and it makes sense. It's a pity people will have to change some of their code if they want to upgrade from 1.02b to 1.1, but that's a price one often has to pay when upgrading to a higher version of a product (any product). We have tried to avoid this as much as possible with iText in the past, but if it's necessary and if people's code gets less complicated after the change, we should go through with it. If somebody should ask to restore the Table object and work with a Table2 object, I wouldn't do this: it would make the code more complex and less maintainable. With RtfWriter and RtfWriter2, the old and the new code is completely separated. That's excellent, but it can't be done with an object such as Table. Steve, could you shape your mail in a Q&A form? I would like to add it to the FAQ. br, Bruno ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
