On Tuesday 14 February 2006 16:03, Andrey wrote:
> I don't know why it was implemented in such a way. It obviously sets a
> limit of .rtf file size.
I can also no longer say what the rationale was for implementing it that way 
at the time.

> Using this approach I have generated 448mb .rtf file (the simple one). Of
> cause it was done with CACHE_DISK data cache style. Not very fast but
> reliable :)
>
> Eh... Now it's time to ask the local GURUs ;)
> Does my approach have any limitations?
The approach seems sensible, I will look into it and see if I can find any 
reason not to do it like that. If not then your suggestion will be integrated 
into the iText codebase.

Greetings,
Mark
-- 
Your lover will never wish to leave you.

My GPG public key is available at:
http://www.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/~mhall/data/security/MarkHall.asc

Attachment: pgpwjoQSXOiG5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to