Mark Hall wrote: > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 17:35, Bruno Lowagie wrote: >> I will have to keep Table (unfortunately) and >> probably HeaderFooter (but not for long).
> Are you sure that there is no way to remove Table in the long run? Table still serves it purpose in some cases... > I mean it > simplifies my life, as otherwise I would have to extend RtfTable a lot. That's not only true for RtfTable. There are some projects that make extensive use of Table with success. I don't want to break those projects. > On > the other hand I know that the Table class is a bit of a nuisance when > generating PDF and perhaps this is the time to think of a 1 or 2 year plan > for removing it. Perhaps merge a bit of it into SimpleTable and then change > the createPdfPTable and createTable calls into createPdfPTable and > createRtfTable. Or something completely different. That was one of the reasons why I introduced SimpleTable, but then I got the book contract, and didn't have the time to pursue this idea. br, Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
