Sorry for the delay, been out of commission... I completely understand the desire to not have to maintain fragile/ buggy code related to encryption, but why not use an interfaced based solution so that those that want to create a smaller distribution can?
Again, I am willing to do that work, and I will provide an implementation that uses 'bouncy castle', as long as I have some degree of assurance the code will be accepted. Why is this so difficult? It is fairly common practice for most open- source projects (and even good commercial ones), to limit hard dependencies to other projects when possible. Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
