On Apr 30, 2007, at 8:05 PM, William Alexander Segraves wrote:
> Now, while this appears to be completely compliant with the Reader
> 7 EULA,
> it seems to me to be a bit silly to have to resort to such a scheme
> to get
> around a EULA limitation that is aimed at protecting the Reader
> Extensions'
> marketability, especially when Reader, with or without the Reader
> Extensions, is incapable of doing some of the things that need to
> be done,
> e.g., shifting genealogical data up or down by one or more
> generations.
>
As I mentioned, XFA-based forms FULLY support this type of dynamic
form in Reader - even without Reader Extensions.
> OTOH, perhaps all I need to do is add the appropriate "submit"
> actions to a
> Reader-Enabled form. Leonard, is it your opinion that the Reader 7
> EULA
> would PERMIT localhost serving of a filled AcroForm if said use
> involves a
> form that is Reader-Enabled?
>
Yes, if the form is Reader Enabled, you could use a localhost server...
Leonard
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
