Exactly, so just recompiling flying saucer would just do it (I'm doing it for my own needs).
My question was more about asking an 'official' release. Should I ask iText team to restore the old methods ou should I ask flying saucer team for a release compiled with iText 2.1.2+ ? BTW thanks very much for your answer ________________________________ De : 1T3XT info <[email protected]> À : Post all your questions about iText here <[email protected]> Envoyé le : Mercredi, 22 Juillet 2009, 16h57mn 32s Objet : Re: [iText-questions] Using iText 2.1.x with flyingsaucer R8 Adrian Gonzalez wrote: > Could you restore the old method signature, or should I ask on > flyingsaucer forum to modify flyingsaucer source code base? None of the above: "it's still source compatible though so anybody needing/wanting to use iText 2.1.2+ will just need to recompile FS for themselves." In other words: it's sufficient to recompile Flying Saucer; no code changes are needed. -- This answer is provided by 1T3XT BVBA http://www.1t3xt.com/ - http://www.1t3xt.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
