mkl wrote: >> We'll update the POM if necessary, but we expect the Maven >> users to tell us what they need. > > That wont be too big a problem. As iText changes substantially, it would be > very much ok to publish the new iText artifacts using a different group > identifier which may very well be com.itextpdf instead of the former > com.lowagie. Additionally the mainClass entry has to be updated to reflect > the new packages. At first glance that's all there is to change.
But that's something that has to be done by the Maven/Doxia/iBiblio people, isn't it? That's not something the iText people can do? Or am I wrong about this? -- This answer is provided by 1T3XT BVBA http://www.1t3xt.com/ - http://www.1t3xt.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
