Mike and all,
M_Borg wrote: > Do I have to migrate to this to make my signatures conformant with today's > specifications. Is this ultimately why my version 2.1.7 generated > signature dictionaries are so different when manually applying a signature > using Acrobat client versus using iText version 2.1.7? > > Any guidance on how to correct welcomed. Also, has anyone implemented a > PAdES compliant signature yet. I seemed to recall someone on this list > was working on such an implementation. PKCS#7 style signature containers can be used in iText version 2. I'm not an expert, though, on how to do that using iText alone as I'm using external libraries to generate the signature container. If I were you, I would inspect the samples once again and look for "/adbe.pkcs7.detached" or PdfName.ADBE_PKCS7_DETACHED. But maybe someone else can give a pointer more on target... As you mention PAdES... for that you definitively have to switch to using CMS containers instead of PKCS#1. Regards, Michael. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Specifying-Signature-Field%27s-Signature-Dictionary-to-reference--SubFilter-adbe.pkcs7.detached-tp28405887p28411183.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
