mkl wrote: > > Unless the prefixes to use are fixed in the context of XMP and are > required to be defined in the "rdf:Description" node, this smells very > buggy. >
If I understand the spec correctly, "xmp" merely is the preferred namespace prefix, not the only one allowed. And I don't find anything that forces anyone to put the namespace prefix directive into the "rdf:Description" node. I'm afraid, XmpReader (and its callers) have to be fixed or replaced. Regards, Michael. -- View this message in context: http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/Sign-a-PDF-A-tp3627882p3632840.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
