Stefan, Stefan Santesson wrote: > If my approach is acceptable, then I could easily provide a backwards > compatible patch for this.
If I recall correctly, a completely overhauled signature api for itext currently is being created. Therefore, I think that it is more important that such problems are not in that api anymore. Regards, Michael. PS: I would gladly act as a beta tester... ;) -- View this message in context: http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/Signature-validation-bug-in-iText-5-1-1-tp3729972p3733407.html Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
