This is a good point. Now it is more clear to me. I'll wait for the paper on
5.3.0.

thanks a lot


1T3XT BVBA wrote
> 
> 1. aren't mentioned in the PAdES standard, or
> 2. will be deprecated in PDF 2.0.
> You'll read all about it the upcoming paper.
> In short: by choosing to stay with iText 5.2.1, you'll be creating 
> signatures that will become obsolete in 2013. If that's your choice, 
> 


--
View this message in context: 
http://itext-general.2136553.n4.nabble.com/iText-5-2-2-with-signature-patch-tp4655452p4655462.html
Sent from the iText - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions

iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA.
Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference 
to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/
Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: 
http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php

Reply via email to