On 27/12/2012 12:41, John Renfrew wrote: > Is there some bit of wisdom I am missing or is this expected, if slightly > less than acceptable, behaviour?
The syntax used by iText is correct according to ISO-32000-1, but the interpretation by some non-Adobe PDF viewers is at times flawed. I think Acrobat takes this into account when rewriting the annotation. Without seeing the PDF, I'd guess that Acrobat replaces a single annotation with two inter-linked annotations. It goes without saying that you can also create such annotations using iText, but there's probably no convenience method available to do this more or less automatically. It will need more coding. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
