Hi Antonio,
Do you have any comments on my email below? If you can help
answer the questions about the size discrepancies that would be really
helpful.
Thanks,
Milind
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Resending my previous email since it exceeded the size limit for the list.
I will include the attachments in the following emails.
Hi Antonio,
Thanks for the quick reply. I modified the program (as you
suggested - attached). When I start the program and the dlg:show calls the
resizematrix_cb for matA I see the values as shown in the attached image
watch1.
So now here is the 1st thing I don't understand. Why is matC which has more
columns has a natural size in X which is smaller than matA which has 1 less
column? This is even before I do any modifications to the sizes of the
columns.
Now as soon as I resize matA rows and columns with my resize calculations
the matA naturalsize and rastersize get bigger. So somehow something is not
right in my calculations. Let me repeat my calculation rules I use:
1. Every cell has 8 pixels of decoration in X and in Y direction.
2. The matrix has a border of 2
3. rastersize is the actual size of the matrix control I can use when I
include the matrix control border (2) and decoration for each cell (8)
4. rasterheightX and rasterwidthX gives the size of the cell after removing
the decoration part (8).
So with a rastersize dimension of X and n cells of dimensions x1,x2,...xn
the following is true:
X = 2+x1+x2+...+xn+8*n
Is this not right? I am forcing the scroll bar to autohide by setting dx =
xmax-xmin and dy=ymax-ymin.
After I just resize matA cells (matC is not resized) the values change to
as shown in the attached image watch2. My calculation distributed 459 to
each cell width since it satisfied the equation 936 = 2+ 459*2 + 8*2 and
the rows are 10 and 488 since they satisfy the equation 516 = 2 +
10+488+8*2 but when I do that the rastersize of A has changed from 936x516
to 1010x531. I am not able to explain this.
Thanks,
Milind
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Antonio Scuri <sc...@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
wrote:
Hi,
I didn't check all your calculations, but did you noticed that when the
dialog is resize you do the FitMat* twice? When MatA is resized, you
compute both, then MatC is also resized and you compute both again.
I think it would more interesting to set the size only of the respective
metrix inside resizematrix_cb.
And if the size is growing this means that you are setting a combination
of sizes that are larger than the current size. Must recheck those
calculations. Try inspecting the new sizes and comparing them to the
calculated size.
Best,
Scuri
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I think the problem may be occurring because of the following which I don't
understand:
I have a iuptabs control that starts off with a size of 776x361 clientsize
(which is the same as either matrix rastersize.) I have 2 matrix controls
in the 2 tabs and I resize its rows and columns as follows:
matA has 2 rows (including title) and 2 columns (no column title). Title
row rasterheight = 10 (fixed) row 1 rasterheight = 333 (adjusted to occupy
the remaining height of the matrix). This should give the total matrix
height of 333+10+2*8+2 = 361 which matches the height of the matrix. (2 is
for the border and 8 for the cell decorations)
matA has 2 columns with no title. Both columns are distributed the space
equally. So their rasterwidth is set to 379 both. That should give the
total matrix width of:
379*2+2*8+2 = 776 which matches the width of the matrix
matC has 2 rows same as matA and they are given the same size of 10 and 333
matC has 3 columns. 1st column is fixed at 12 the remaining 2 columns get
the space equally and are set to 369. This should give the matrix width of:
369*2+8*3+12+2 = 776 which matches the width of the matrix
After these sizings happen the natural size and rastersize of matA changes
to 850x376 and the natural size of matC changes to 791x376 while its
rastersize if 850x376. The iuptabs natural size and rastersize changes to
858x407
I don't understand why does the natural and rastersize of the matrix
elements and iuptabs change when I resize the columns to precisely fit in
their current rastersize? Am I calculating something wrong here?
Thanks for any help.
Milind
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
I have this sample attached. The aim is to resize the matrix
columns and cells automatically depending on the weight assigned to the
columns whenever the dialog is resized. The sizing algorithm works fine
when I trace the steps of the sizes allotted to different columns.
The problem is that after a few resize iterations the iuptab size
suddenly becomes larger than the dialog clientsize. I am not able to
explain that and that causes the automatic resizing of the matrix not to
work as intended.
I would really appreciate any help as to why the tabs size
increases beyond the dialog client size.
Thanks,
Milind
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
