Hi Milind,

  If you are talking about the extra lines at the root node then yes, they
are removed when root is added automatically. On the other hand they are
included when ADDROOT=NO. This occurs only in Windows, because that lines
are very inconvenient when using a root node in Windows, and necessary when
many nodes are used instead.

  If you don't want those lines or if you don't want an initial root node,
but will still use a single root node afterwards, then leave ADDROOT=Yes,
and manually remove the root node right after the tree is mapped.

Best,
Scuri




On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Milind Gupta <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Antonio,
>         If during creation a root node was not added to the iuptree, is it
> possible to add it later. It seems any leaf or branch added does not look
> exactly like a root node that is created when the control is mapped.
>
> Thanks,
> Milind
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Iup-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users

Reply via email to