Hi,

  So along with the definitions:

export LUA_SUFFIX=
export LUA_INC=/usr/include/lua5.1

  You should also define:

LUA_BIN=/usr/bin

  This was missing in the "Building  Lua, IM, ..." documentation.

  Regarding the difference from doing that or defining on the command line
I don't know why it didn't work. But I suspect it is related to the fact
that make is invoked from inside the Makefile. This would also explain the
"-p" parameter problem.

Best,
Scuri


2018-03-01 15:49 GMT-03:00 sur-behoffski <sur_behoff...@grouse.com.au>:

> On 03/02/18 00:21, Antonio Scuri wrote:
>
>>    Hi,
>>
>>    I don't know why make is not behaving as you expect. I never used it in
>> that way.
>>
>>    Regarding bin2c, I didn't understand what you are trying to change.
>> bin2c.lua is included in IUP source code.
>>
>> Best,
>> Scuri
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> G'day,
>
> [As an aside: In response to my IUP "Footnote 2":  I see that the IUP
> Subversion repository seems to be stable, and now is at r4693; a week
> ago it was at r4682.]
>
> The build variable BIN2C breaks down into three parts:
>
>     1. Finding a suitable path to a Lua interpreter;
>     2. Invoking that interpreter via its name; and
>     3. Using the script "bin2c.lua", as provided by the sources.
>
> My problem is with a snippet of code that uses the bin2c.lua script
> to convert some binary data into a C header file that encodes the
> bytes of the binary.  The file extension is 'lh'; the tecmake.mak
> rule that generates commands for this conversion is the static
> pattern rule:
>
> --- (cut here) ---
>
> $(LHDIR)/%.lh: $(OBJROOT)/%.lo
>         @echo ''; echo Tecmake: generating $(<F)
>         $(ECHO)$(BIN2C) $< > $@
>
> --- (end of snippet) ---
>
> Tracking back, the definition of BIN2C happens in the middle of
> a definition block "ifdef USE_LUA ... endif".  The code in that
> area of tecmake.mak (about line 1036-1046) is:
>
> --- (cut here) ---
>
>   LUA_INC ?= LUA/include
>   INCLUDES += $(LUA_INC)
>
>   LUA_BIN ?= $(LUA)/bin/$(TEC_UNAME)
>   ifdef USE_BIN2C_LUA
>     BIN2C := $(LUA_BIN)/lua$(LUA_SFX) $(BIN2C_PATH)bin2c.lua
>   else
>     BIN2C := $(LUA_BIN)bin2c$(LUA_SFX)
>   endif
>   LUAC   := $(LUA_BIN)luac$(LUA_SFX)
>   LUABIN := $(LUA_BIN)lua($LUA_SFX)
>
> --- (end of snippet) ---
>
> The problems I have comes from trying to invoke Lua, where my code
> perhaps does not line up with the build system expectations:
>
> 1. I don't include building Lua in the "tecgraf" build tree, alongside
>    IM/CD/IUP; instead, I simply want to invoke the OS-installed
>    package for Lua 5.1.5;
>
> 2. On Linux Mint (derived from Ubuntu), typing simply "lua", or,
>    equally simply, "lua5.1", invokes Lua; tecmake.mak sets LUA_SFX to
>    "5.1", so the command to invoke Lua is "lua5.1"; but
>
> 3. On Gentoo Linux, things are set up differently, and, while there
>    is a Lua interpreter at /usr/bin/lua, there is no /usr/bin/lua5.1.
>    Therefore, on Gentoo, tecmake.mak's composes the wrong command to
>    invoke Lua, and therefore the build fails.
>
> In addition, I'm also a little confused about similarities or
> differences between defining symbols to the shell, versus defining
> them on the command line, e.g. (taken from the IM/CD/IUP build
> guide, Ubuntu GNU/Linux build section):
>
>     export LUA_SUFFIX=
>     export LUA_INC=/usr/include/lua5.1
>
> versus (my own code, a trial that did not work):
>
>     cd /base/im/src
>     make LUA_SUFFIX= LUA_INC=/usr/include/lua5.1
>
> (When focussing on CD, I added a symlink in /usr/bin so that both
> /usr/bin/lua and /usr/bin/lua5.1 were valid, but I don't want to do
> this in all installations, as it cuts across the package manager's
> boundaries.)
>
> thanks in advance for any assistance,
>
> s-b etc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Iup-users mailing list
> Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Iup-users mailing list
Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users

Reply via email to