Moved to mailing list rather than bug. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:17 PM, BJ Dierkes <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, because both sqlite and subversion exist in RHEL they are not > a good fit for EPEL based on their packaging guidelines.
Really? Obviously if these were upgrades that would be a problem but co-existing packages. This really is not permitted? I was thinking of python31 that recently went into Fedora but of course that's Fedora not EPEL. I was going to ask. Why not add the your python26 packages to EPEL.. Lets see what happens. Steve >By 'new' > package you must mean new to IUS? Also... I was looking into sqlite the > other day... that one will have to be a 'parallel install' package like > python26/python31/etc because any existing sqlite databases on the box > will need to use the older version of sqlite. The one I did was parallel. Its fairly complete. Of course if the EPEL route fails I'll follow up here. > > I'll add some documentation to wiki.iuscommunity.org regarding 'parallel > packages'. > > -- > RFE: Request newer SVN client at least. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528409 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Steve Traylen _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ius-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ius-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
