Hi Jakov/Ben,

PHP Zend extensions can conflict with others quite often. The solution is to 
change the ordering of how they load, in this case it was to move opcache to be 
the first extension to be loaded.

The RPMs appear to additionally be introducing opcache as a standard extension 
as well.

I’ve submitted 2 PRs to solve this. I’m unsure if this is the reason for 
Jakov’s PHP’s behaviour, but is a good start.

https://github.com/iuscommunity-pkg/php56u/pull/13
https://github.com/iuscommunity-pkg/php55u/pull/15

@Jakov, you should be able to delete the /etc/php.d/opcache.ini manually, which 
then you might be able to see if this is the cause.

Note there may be another extension opcache might conflict with, so the 
ordering, and/or use of the conflicting extensions might need to change.

Kind Regards

Andy


> On 20 Aug 2015, at 00:22, Jakov Sosic <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 08/17/2015 03:57 PM, Ben Harper wrote:
>> You mentioned that you are rebuilding your php packages against httpd24.
>>  Can you reproduce this issue with stock IUS php packages?
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> sorry for the late answer, but I finally got some spare time and I found a 
> reason for this segfault.
> 
> Problem was within opcache module, and actually, problem was that I had two 
> files:
> 
> /etc/php.d/10-opcache.ini
> 
> and
> 
> /etc/php.d/opcache.ini
> 
> 
> Both files had same content, which is ok. Reason I had these two files was 
> that I use puppet as CM, and in 5.6 you guys changed names of the ini files 
> by adding enumeration in front of them, and puppet deployed this file as 
> usual.
> 
> 
> Actually, to reproduce it, it is enough to have:
> 
> zend_extension=opcache.so
> zend_extension=opcache.so
> 
> in /etc/php.ini.
> 
> 
> While this is my mistake, I still am puzzled as to why does php segfault in 
> this case. IMHO, php should handle multiple .so loading same as Apache does, 
> by printing warning and ignoring the second 'zend_extension=' line...
> 
> I already filed a bug upstream, so I'll just update the bug description, or 
> open a new bug...
> 
> What puzzles me though is that I remember having this problem with early 
> 5.6.x versions (5.6.3) even with opcache disabled, so I'm kinda really lost.
> 
> I'll give it a little bit more testing to see if it's stable enough to move 
> prod to 5.6.x now.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ius-community
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ius-community
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ius-community
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ius-community
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to