If OBS and GBS are building the same package, why wouldn't they get the
same result (assuming no circular references)?

FYI, I'm finding a lot of build errors that are hard to understand-- Things
like:

   - Configure script gives errors
   - Various compile errors (conflicting definitions/undeclared; warnings,
   with "treat warnings as errors" turned on..; etc.)
   - use of deprecated api's g_mutex_new, g_mutex_free, g_cond_timed_wait
   - ld errors
   - Multiple missing 1.x patch files on 2.x build
   - Missing libraries
   - "Architecture is excluded" (i686 with -Ai586 on build line)
   - rpmlint exceeds "badness" score
   - rpm error "installed but unpackaged files found"
   - Makefile.am: required directory does not exist (".intl)
   - use of %(x) construct causes lots of commentary from rpm...
   - quite a number and variety of other warnings

All but the last two would have halted the package build.  I expect that a
developer touching the package would have tried to rebuild the package and
would have noticed and repaired any package defects.

It is as though changes are getting checked in and peer reviewed without
the package being built to confirm that the package is created...

So, how do we fix this?  Then, how do we verify that what is fixed for gbs
is also correct for obs?  (In these cases, it really should be--but if it's
building in obs then something is not reciprocal...)

For what it's worth, I'm more than willing to help--I just want to be sure
that what I'm doing is really the Right Thing To Do.  :-)

Thanks for listening,
Paul



Paul Hanchett
-------------------
Infotainment Engineer
MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor, Portland,
Oregon, 97204

Email: [email protected]
-------------------

Business Details:
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF
Registered in England No: 1672070


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:14 AM, VanCutsem, Geoffroy <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes:
> http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/tizen/ivi/latest/builddata/buildlogs/ia32/succeeded/valgrind.buildlog.txt
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> > Behalf Of Jian-feng Ding
> > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 1:57 PM
> > To: Hanchett, Paul
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Gbs errors during Tizen 3.0 build
> >
> > Can this package be built successfully in OBS?
> >
> > thanks
> > - jf.ding
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:46AM -0700, Hanchett, Paul wrote:
> > > In another case (valgrind-3.8.1-0) I see this unexpected error:
> > >
> > > [  104s] checking for features.h... yes [  105s] checking the
> > > GLIBC_VERSION version... unsupported version 2.18 [  105s] configure:
> > > error: Valgrind requires glibc version 2.2 - 2.16 [  105s] error: Bad
> > > exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HEn9sE (%build) [  105s] [  105s] [
> > > 105s] RPM build errors:
> > > [  105s]     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HEn9sE (%build)
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Hanchett
> > > -------------------
> > > Infotainment Engineer
> > > MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
> > > One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor,
> > > Portland, Oregon, 97204
> > >
> > > Email: [email protected]
> > > -------------------
> > >
> > > Business Details:
> > > Jaguar Land Rover Limited
> > > Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered in
> > > England No: 1672070
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Hanchett, Paul
> > > <[email protected]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On many packages (10 or more), I'm seeing errors that look like this
> > > > (note the highlighted file names):
> > > >
> > > > [  311s] + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
> > > > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/scons-2.2.0
> > > > [  311s] + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress [  311s] +
> > > > /usr/lib/rpm/brp-tizen [  311s] + /usr/lib/rpm/tizen/find-docs.sh
> > > > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/
> > > > scons-2.2.0-0.i386
> > > > [  311s] error: Bad file: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/
> > > > scons-1.2.0-noenv.patch: No such file or directory [  311s] error:
> > > > Bad file: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/
> > > > scons-1.2.0-fix-install.patch: No such file or directory [  311s] [
> > > > 311s] [  311s] RPM build errors:
> > > > [  311s]     Bad file:
> > > > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scons-1.2.0-noenv.patch: No such file
> > > > or directory
> > > > [  311s]     Bad file:
> > > > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scons-1.2.0-fix-install.patch: No such
> > > > file or directory
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How do you get these files to build, even in OBS?  (this should be
> > > > on whatever the tizen branch points to...)
> > > >
> > > > TIA for your thoughts and help!
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > Paul Hanchett
> > > > -------------------
> > > > Infotainment Engineer
> > > > MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
> > > > One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor,
> > > > Portland, Oregon, 97204
> > > >
> > > > Email: [email protected]
> > > > -------------------
> > > >
> > > > Business Details:
> > > > Jaguar Land Rover Limited
> > > > Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered
> > > > in England No: 1672070
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IVI mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IVI mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
> Intel Corporation NV/SA
> Kings Square, Veldkant 31
> 2550 Kontich
> RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718.
> Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi

Reply via email to