Hi Qiang,

As a small addenda, the results of my latest attempt are in. Using the
manifest you suggested I get enormous number of missing libgcc47 errors.
Like this:
cross-i386-gcc48-icecream-backend:
  nothing provides cross-i386-binutils
  nothing provides libgcc47
capi-content-mime-type:
  nothing provides libgcc47
m4:
  nothing provides libgcc47
perl-gettext:
  nothing provides libgcc47
org.tizen.image-viewer:
  nothing provides libgcc47
capi-system-runtime-info:
  nothing provides libgcc47
kernel-x86-ivi:
  nothing provides libgcc47
iso_ent:
  nothing provides libgcc47
doxygen:
  nothing provides libgcc47
freealut:
  nothing provides libgcc47
busybox:
  nothing provides libgcc47
ug-camera-efl:
  nothing provides libgcc47
ofono:
  nothing provides libgcc47
...

So no, it doesn't work.  (Presumably this is gcc47 -> gcc48 related.)

~ Steve


On 18 September 2013 15:34, Maurer, Steven <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Qiang,
>
> Thanks for looking into this. I really do appreciate it.
>
> > GBS use totally Tizen chroot env to build package, so it will not use
> host env and library.
>
> That may be the intent, but it doesn't seem to be true on my system.
> Otherwise, my adding those symbolic links would not have altered anything.
> **
>
> As an additional test, today I altered the symbolic links in the top level
> of my host machine to the following:
>
>                                  /usr/lib/gcc/i586-tizen-linux ->
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu
>
>                                 /usr/i586-tizen-linux ->
> /home/smaurer/GBS-ROOT-git3/local/BUILD-ROOTS/scratch.i586.0/usr/i586-tizen-linux
> (note: the latter path goes to the local GBS-ROOT alternative, of all the
> different configurations I've been trying to get this to work.)
>
> When I did this (and also added the missing "intl" directory into
> .../scratch.i586.0/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gettext-0.18.1.1) the
> following command finished without error:
>
>                          gbs build -A i586 --incremental
> platform/upstream/gettext
>
> So I think I can state categorically that, at least for my system, gbs has
> a dependency on the external build machine/
>
>
> > For your case about build-initvm.spec, actually, this package also has
> not been build in OBS and does not exist in released repo:****
>
> >
> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/latest/repos/ivi/ia32/packages/
> ****
>
> **Thanks.  That's good to know. We got instructions last week about using
> some specific manifests
> (tizen_20130829.9-ivi-release-mbr-i586.manifest.xml) and the repo "
> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/tizen_20130913.12/";.
> However after trying it out, it barely compiled any packages at all.  There
> were huge and repeated conflicts between the Tizen gcc-4.8 package and the
> Tizen gcc-4.7 package, on a completely virgin checkout (compiled with
> gcc4.8 installed in Ubuntu).**
>
> Due to this, I went back to the following (again on a virgin checkout):
>
>                           repo init -u ssh://
> [email protected]/scm/manifest -m ivi.xml; repo sync
>
> And ran this command:
>
>                           gbs build -A i586 --threads 2 --clean-once
> --exclude=texinfo,systemd,build
>
> ...on repo url=${work_dir}/pre-built/toolchain-x86/
>
> ------------------------------------
> ...for which I got the errors I mentioned above, about 100 packages
> further on.  I then got even further by putting in the symbolic link hacks.
>
> You will note that I simply excluded the "build' package (which used
> build-initvm.spec), because the spec file told me to change it to looks
> like what I already have, so I could not fix it any further.
> Now today, I went ahead and tried to build with the above symbolic links
> in place, and doing so let me get further in building than I ever have
> before. I'm now more than a third of the way through. Almost to the point
> where I could begin to actually contribute to Tizen IVI, maybe.
>
>
> > Which code base(snapsho) are you using? The latest one is
> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/tizen_20130917.3****
>
> > Are you using tizen.org git manifest or manifest in
> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/tizen_20130917.3/builddata/manifest/
>  ?
>
> **I did not, but I intend to see what happens when I do, so in a fresh
> directory I am doing the following:**
>
>                                repo init -u tizen:/scm/manifest -m
> tizen_20130917.3_ia32.xml
>                        repo sync -m tizen_20130917.3_ia32.xml
>
>                                Putting in a .gbs.conf file that points to
> the repository you mentioned.
>
>                               gbs build -A i586 --threads 1 --clean-once
> --exclude=texinfo,systemd,build
>
> If this fails, I'll go and change the link in /usr/i586-tizen-linux to the
> new GBS-ROOT location.
>
> This is going to take a while, so I'll likely have to tell you the results
> tomorrow.
>
> Thanks, ~ Steve
>
>
> On 17 September 2013 23:46, Zhang, Qiang Z <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  GBS use totally Tizen chroot env to build package, so it will not use
>> host env and library.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> For your case about build-initvm.spec, actually, this package also has
>> not been build in OBS and does not exist in released repo:****
>>
>>
>> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/latest/repos/ivi/ia32/packages/
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> That means build-initvm.spec has not been used for finally tizen image,
>> the real reason for this package is that it missing a dependency, you can
>> fix like this:****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> /upstream/build$ git diff****
>>
>> diff --git a/packaging/build-initvm.spec b/packaging/build-initvm.spec***
>> *
>>
>> index cef4a23..e259ef7 100644****
>>
>> --- a/packaging/build-initvm.spec****
>>
>> +++ b/packaging/build-initvm.spec****
>>
>> @@ -28,9 +28,7 @@ AutoReqProv:    off****
>>
>> Requires:       build****
>>
>> BuildRequires:  gcc****
>>
>> BuildRequires:  glibc-devel****
>>
>> -%if 0%{?suse_version} > 1200****
>>
>> BuildRequires:  glibc-devel-static****
>>
>> -%endif****
>>
>> ****
>>
>>  %description****
>>
>> This package provides a script for building RPMs for SUSE Linux in a****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Which code base(snapsho) are you using? The latest one is
>> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/tizen_20130917.3****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Are you using tizen.org git manifest or manifest in
>> http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/tizen_20130917.3/builddata/manifest/?
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks****
>>
>> Qiang****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Maurer, Steven
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:52 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>
>> *Subject:* Major reason for inability to build Tizen sources found...****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi people,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I've just come across a reason why I've been unable to build Tizen IVI in
>> a vanilla environment: there are absolute paths to tool chains and
>> dependencies on specific internal libraries of the cross-platform host.**
>> **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> When I attempt to "gbs build -A i586 platform/upstream/build" in the root
>> git directory, the following error is left in the failure log:
>> .../logs/fail/build-initvm-20120927-0/log.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
>> /usr/lib/gcc/i586-tizen-linux/4.8/../../../../i586-tizen-linux/bin/ld:
>> cannot find -lc****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> This error shows that the build depends on an absolute path in the host
>> machine. A directory /usr/lib/gcc/i586-tizen-linux/4.8 must exist, a
>> /usr/i586-tizen-linux/bin/ld must exist, and there is an implicit
>> dependency on the host's library files. This also happens with
>> platform/upstream/gettext package. I strongly suspect that many more
>> packages have this dependency as well, but cannot test it because nothing
>> else builds past those two packages.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> To test further, I went ahead and made a number of symbolic links to
>> point these absolute paths to my local host's default toolchain, and tried
>> to rebuild. This immediately ran into a link error because my host
>> environment is Ubuntu 64-bit, and this naturally didn't link with the
>> 32-bit Tizen executables.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> A total of 239 of 850 packages do build correctly before getting to these
>> dependencies, but these are all just vanilla Linux packages. All the
>> Tizen-specific libraries and applications needed for Tizen-specific
>> development (for example developing a vehicle specific plugin
>> for automotive-message-broker) do not build. I run into an onslaught of
>> "nothing provides <package>" errors. I am unsure about whether this is
>> caused by the toolchain dependency.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In the short term, I would like some help from the people who actually
>> *can* build further than this. Where are people getting this
>> i586-tizen-linux toolchain from? It does not appear to be documented
>> anywhere accessible by google. Until I can get this, I cannot do any sort
>> of Tizen development.  It is impossible, as has been suggested, to simply
>> build packages to work on top of Tizen. To do such development you still
>> need basic Tizen libraries and header files, and the packages that provide
>> those don't build.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In the long term, let me also state my concerns as to why this can't just
>> be ignored. Since it appears that Tizen images have library code from the
>> development environment baked into them, everyone's Tizen image is going to
>> differ, even if built from identical sources, and this could lead to
>> consistency issues. There is also a GPL issue, as incorporating non-public
>> libraries and irreproducible build environments that make seemingly public
>> code non-buildable is something it specifically prohibits (not everybody is
>> so persnickety, but automotive manufacturers are very cognizant of legal
>> liabilities).****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> -- ****
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> Steven Maurer
>> -------------------
>> Infotainment Engineer
>> MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
>> One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor,
>> Portland, Oregon, 97204
>>
>> Email: [email protected]****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards
>
> Steven Maurer
> -------------------
> Infotainment Engineer
> MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
> One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor, Portland,
> Oregon, 97204
>
> Email: [email protected]
> -------------------
>
>


-- 
Kind Regards

Steven Maurer
-------------------
Infotainment Engineer
MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor, Portland,
Oregon, 97204

Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi

Reply via email to