Hello Olivier, I think I understand where you want to go but Thiago's perspective is perfectly fit in this situation. When we look at, two different customer (IVI and mobile) needs and vendor benefits, this becomes advantage of Tizen maintainers (Intel and Samsung) in a many areas.
Perfectly matchs after all IVI and mobile differences. --- Oytun 2013/12/12 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> > On quarta-feira, 11 de dezembro de 2013 22:49:18, olivier nyssen wrote: > > The Tizen Association document is clear: "Tizen applications will run on > all > > devices across the Tizen ecosystem". Intel seems to consider OSP as a > > Samsung tool. It was a Samsung tool but now it's a Tizen tool so it's an > > Intel tool. If you don't like it, modify it. What are you going to tell > to > > the public ? "OSP is a Samsung tool but IVI is Intel's playground" ? > > The Tizen Association document is not authoritative. The Tizen Compliance > document is. > > Then again, right now, we do not have a Compliance document for the IVI > profile. So we can't say anything about what kinds of applications are > supported on IVI. > > And even if we could, please mind you that IVI is an entirely different > beast > when compared to mobile phones. You're not going to get the same types of > applications and my guess is that auto makers will also not allow you to > install just any kind of application anyway (at least, not in the head > unit). > Think driver distraction. > > Discussing the technology behind the application at this point is, in my > opinion, a moot discussion. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi > >
_______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
