Looks good, thanks! I had focused on the docs, which seem to document the older attributes still.
-- BMW Car IT GmbH David Katz Petuelring 116 80809 München --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- BMW Car IT GmbH Geschäftsführer: Michael Würtenberger und Reinhard Stolle Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- On 09.09.2014 17:07, "Rees, Kevron" <[email protected]> wrote: >Brett is correct. The intention is for the AMB data standard, which >predates the w3c specification, to follow as closely as possible the >w3c vehicle data specification. We've already started harmonizing and >if you look through the amb DBus API IDL specification[1] you can see >older interfaces/attributes being deprecated in favor of the new W3C >interfaces/attributes. > >-Kevron > >[1] - >https://github.com/otcshare/automotive-message-broker/blob/master/docs/amb >.idl#L285 > >On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Branch, Brett <[email protected]> >wrote: >> Hi David, >> AMB is meant to be an implementation of the W3C Vehicle API Spec, so >>they are already unified. (There are some variations in that AMB was >>developed as the spec was being written and was still evolving, and both >>are still evolving currently. But it is absolutely the intention that >>AMB aligns with the spec.) >> >> -Brett >> >> From: David Katz >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 6:35 AM >> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: AMB vs W3C Vehicle API Specification >> >> Hi, >> >> I have been looking at the interfaces offered by the AMB, and obviously >>see quite an overlap with the W3C Vehicle API Specification. >> http://otcshare.github.io/automotive-message-broker/html/annotated.html >> vs >> >>https://rawgit.com/w3c/automotive-bg/master/snapshots/data_spec_snapshot_ >>latest.html >> >> Ignoring language syntax for a second and just looking at these as >>abstract interfaces offering vehicle data to compatible applications in >>a OEM-independant way, what speaks against unifying the two concepts to >>support a common set of interfaces and attributes? >> >> Cheers, >> David Katz >> >> >> -- >> BMW Car IT GmbH >> David Katz >> Petuelring 116 >> 80809 München >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>--------------- >> BMW Car IT GmbH >> Geschäftsführer: Michael Würtenberger und Reinhard Stolle >> Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810 >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>--------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> IVI mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
