> Can I suggest that if you have problems, you follow Hans' advice and > actually state what 0.2 does better than current svn 0.3.9.
I don't know what part of me saying I run 0.2 leads you to believe I have some detailed (accurate) list of what I don't like about 0.3.x, I don't run it, I just read the headlines (clearly making everything I say uninformed hyperbole). Historically it has been rather good advice to choose carefully which upgrades to ivtv you decide to jump to. Fact: the current stable branch does not work on the latest current stable kernel (released 15 days ago). Sadly it isn't a compile problem, you just can't talk to the tuner, which is about as much fun (maybe a little more, but I won't share) as it sounds. The current stable branch is a sham, as much has been admitted here (see: "No one has stepped up to maintain it", also see no changes as of initial import). In terms of process, I think ivtv has recently made some sizeable improvements. That said I do hope the next stable branch won't be allowed to languish as this one has. One day 0.3.9 will be as exciting to update for some as 0.2 is now. Creating a new stable branch is easy and maintaining it continues to be easy while the branches are close. Actually maintaining a stable branch until the next stable branch is ready? That is hard, and isn't being done, even at a minimal level. -- Anduin Withers _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
