Axel, Is this true for the 0.3.x or 0.4 versions as well as the 0.2.0 versions from your archive? I thought the 0.3.x versions didn't have the -ivtv extension?
> Keith is correct. This mechanism allows to deploy ivtv's versions and > have the user choose between the kernel's version (no aliases) and > ivtv's version (with the aliases). > > This was introduced a year or so ago, when a first attempt was made to > get msp3400 merged back to v4l/kernel, and a fast method of comparing > them was needed. > > My recommendation (for now and future) is: Try w/o any aliases and if > something doesn't work add them one by one. E.g. bad detection, then > try ivtv's tveeprom and tuner modules, bad sound, then try ivtv's > msp3400. > > And please report successes and failures as feedback for the ongoing > merge efforts! > -- > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
