Oh, wow, thanks for clarifying! Because of the font on my screen, I thought "Tuner 1" was a lowercase L, I set my second tuner to "Tuner M"! :)
More seriously, I'd like to thank Hans publicly for his work on supporting the MPC-622 card in the new 0.6.0 release (ok, Hans, I'll stop gushing now). Folks, send this man the cards he needs, the results are worth it. Here's a list from an old email of Hans': - AverMedia M179 - Yuan MPG160/Kuroutoshikou ITVC15-STVL - Nagase Transgear 5000TV - Yuan MPG600GR/Kuroutoshikou CX23416GYC-STVLP - GotView PCI DVD Best regards, Justin ----- Original message ----- From: "Hans Verkuil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver" <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:56:05 +0100 Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] [ANNOUNCEMENT] ivtv-0.6.0 released On Wednesday 22 March 2006 04:39, Brendan Hoar wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > > On 22/03/2006, at 10:58 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >> NOTE 2: The names of the inputs have changed to correspond with > > >> the names as are used by the video4linux subsystem. This means > > >> that MythTV users have to setup their inputs again. In > > >> particular 'Tuner 0' is now 'Tuner 1'. > > > > > > This is just illogical. I demand that you change this to 'Tuner > > > A' in the next release. > > > > Obviously you should be using roman numerals... I vote for 'Tuner > > i' -peace > > That's completely wrong! We should stick to using Hans's approach of > using Unary identifiers: Tuner 1, Tuner 11, Tuner 111, etc. Really, did no one get it? It's Tuner 1, Tuner 10, Tuner 11, Tuner 100, Tuner 101, ... Binary rulez! Hans _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
