On Saturday 20 January 2007 16:01, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:51, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > Will you do that? (i'm not really that well informed on ivtv
> > sourcecode)
>
> I'll do it. Actually, I think I'm going to redesign the code that
> uses the semaphore, it's much too complicated for what it does.
Get the latest ivtv trunk code. It should now compile for you.
Thanks,
Hans
>
> Hans
>
> > Maarten.
> >
> > On 1/20/07, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 January 2007 13:13, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > > > Here is a patch that should fix this issue.
> > >
> > > Looking at the patch I see that it can be made simpler by just
> > > replacing the semaphore with a mutex. It's the only one not yet
> > > converted to a mutex.
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > > Maarten.
> > > >
> > > > On 1/20/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I meant, i still use 2.6.19, and i get that error, which may
> > > > > mean there is still a less than obvious bug to fix for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maarten.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/20/07, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday 20 January 2007 12:26, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > > > > > > The current svn seems to compile without change, but i
> > > > > > > get one error:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ivtv: Unknown symbol
> > > > > > > there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suspect that is something 2.6.20 related?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Might well be the case. I haven't compiled against
> > > > > > 2.6.20-rcX. I usually wait with that until the new kernel
> > > > > > is actually released.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hans
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maarten.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 1/20/07, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Saturday 23 December 2006 01:32, Sander Sweers wrote:
> > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [ivtv-users] [PATCH] Compatibility with
> > > > > > > > > realtime kernels Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:52:28
> > > > > > > > > +0100 From: Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > > Reply-To: User discussion about IVTV
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> To: User discussion about
> > > > > > > > > IVTV <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would thoroughly check the patch.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's been test compiled against a ck (my previous
> > > > > > > > > kernel, aka a "more normal" kernel) kernel and
> > > > > > > > > compiled against a realtime kernel.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It should compile against 0.9.1.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let me know if it's ok or not.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Maarten.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maarten,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry for the delay, I completely missed this post at
> > > > > > > > the time and I just accidentally came across it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My question is: can you make a patch for the ivtv trunk
> > > > > > > > code? I consider the current ivtv-0.9 code as
> > > > > > > > end-of-life and it is to be replaced by new code that's
> > > > > > > > currently in the ivtv subversion repository. Since it
> > > > > > > > is changed very substantially it is better if you make
> > > > > > > > a new patch for it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
