Brad Barnett wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:51:58 -0800
> "Rich Kadel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> The real test would be if all 4 PVR 500's will work (stable) with a new
>> motherboard, and I don't have a motherboard in my desktop machine with 4
>> PCI slots.  On a whim, I've crossed my fingers and purchased a new MSI
>> 945P_Neo3-F and Intel Core 2 Duo 6600E (and 2Gigs DDR2) to replace the
>> ASUS board and Opteron.  Maybe this will do the trick.  I'm recompiling
>> the kernel to include SMP.  Let me know if anything here sounds like a
>> bad idea.
>>
>>     
>
> There were SMP issues a while back, but I believe that Hans has solved
> them.
>
> I don't know about this motherboard personally, so I can't comment on it. 
> I would check and make sure that the SATA controller and other tidbits are
> fully supported.  These days though, if the motherboard is a few months
> old (that is, not just new on the market), Linux is generally very good at
> supporting the mainline items on it.
>   

I am not completely sure of this statement.

I recently upgraded from 0.9.1 to 0.10.0 on a single cpu box with 
hyperthreading.  I now get kernel panics within 4 hours if I run a SMP 
kernel whether I am recording or not.  The box remains up but it causes 
the nic in the machine to stop responding and it stops registering 
interrupts.

If I boot with maxcpus=1, then the box remains stable.

Also rolling back to 0.9.1 with HT also gives me a stable box.

I will try to submit a better bug report this weekend.

Michael


_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to