Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 09:24:56 Ian Campbell wrote: >> Are the ivtv-utils still maintained and/or useful or did everything >> worthwhile make it into v4l-utils already? >> >> I've just noticed that v4l-utils conflicts with ivtv-utils in Debian >> (with no attempt to coordinate with me :^() and I'm trying to decide >if >> it is worth uploading an updated ivtv-utils which drops the tools >which >> overlap or if I should request that ivtv-utils is removed from >Debian. >> >> Ian. >> >> > >In my opinion ivtv-utils can be removed from Debian. The duplicate >utilities >should definitely be removed from the ivtv repository as well. The only >remaining utility that I think has some merit is ivtv-radio. All the >others >are more for debugging/testing/developing. > >What do you think, Andy? > >Regards, > > Hans > >_______________________________________________ >ivtv-devel mailing list >ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org >http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
Hans, Ivtv-utils does need some attention, to at least remove any duplicate tools. I only consider ivtv-radio and ivtv-tune useful for the common user. If v4l2-ctl had channel tables, then ivtv-tune could go away. Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
