Attached is a patch for people to try.
Chris
I think this will help and I really cant see it doing any harm so I
would think that it would be reasonable to apply this patch in any case.
It was made against 3.1z and includes the pci_dma_sync_single change as well
which means it wont apply cleanly against 0.2.
I can generate a 0.2 patch if anyone wants it.John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ivtv-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Fenn > Sent: 07 December 2004 10:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] Has anyone had ivtv-fb working on Fedora Core 3 > (2.6.9-1.681)? > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:59:18AM +0000, John Harvey wrote: > > Just a quick update. I think i understand the problem > > though i couldn't reproduce it with my 2.6.9 or 2.6.10 > > kernels but that is probably down to kernel > > configuration. > > Anyway looking at the stack trace there are call being > > maded to functions in the fb_ops structure that we > > dont initialise and they arent checked for NULL. So we > > just need to fill the function table out a bit more. > > I'll search tonight for any unchecked calls and add > > them to the table and check to make sure it will build > > with older kernels. So i should be able to get a patch > > out later tonight. > > > > I'll be glad to serve as a crazy, FC3 usin' nutjob to volunteer for > patch test duty. Stability is for weenies. ;) > > Regards, > Tim > > -- > Morals? I eat communism and $h!t America, brother. --Seanbaby > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
ivtv_3.1z.diffs
Description: Binary data
