On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:22, Peter Martens wrote: > Probably just my stupidity, but I really cannot apply those patches > from you, Jarod. I always get rejections on those. Something special > needed to apply those (I am using -p0)? Thanks for all the nice work.
How are you saving the patches to apply them? If you're cutting and pasting, it could be white-space getting converted to something other than what its supposed to be (i.e., tabs to spaces or vice versa). If you save the patch attachment, it should apply just fine. If you're already doing that, might need try a -p1 to patch, I think I habitually always use -p1. This definitely works for me: patch -p1 -d ivtv-0.3.2h < morepalupdates-032h.patch (Patch is in the same dir as the expanded ivtv-0.3.2h) > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:00:47 -0800, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:32, Jasper van der Neut wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > It looks like there are two different LG TAPE tuners used on PAL > > > > PVR-150 cards, because the current def seems to work perfectly for > > > > folks with tuner idx=97. I'm looking at the datasheet for your tuner > > > > right now, looks like another tuner definition is in order. > > > > > > > > > Hope you'll find the latest missing link. > > > > > > > > I believe I have. I'll try to whip up a patch in just a few... > > > > > > Attached patch is working for me. > > > > > > Patch is against 0.3.2h + tveeprom patch > > > > Please give the attached a try instead. Its against 0.3.2h, and includes > > all my tuner and tveeprom changes for all three PAL PVR-150/500 variants. > > The tuner def your patch modifies is the idx 97 tuner, so it shouldn't be > > modified, you may break tuning for other people, I think. My patch > > includes another tuner def for the idx 60 tuner, as well as the needed > > tveeprom update to have it properly auto-detected. > > > > What is the other part of your patch for? -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp8fRNncNLBK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
