Wow. This KT333 board just isn't working. It's absolutely fine in the Intel machines. Does anyone know what exactly the issue is so that we might be able to pin it down better?
I wouldn't even know how to go about finding what the cause of the problem is. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Jason --- Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 13, 2005, at 13:51, Nuno Grilo wrote: > > > I had an AMD system with a via KM400 and the > reliability of the > > system, especialy in playback, was very low. > > I changed to a nforce2 motherboard and all > problems went away. > > On the flip side, I've never had a problem with any > of the motherboards > I've used, which includes a pair of nForce2 boards, > but also two older > dual PIII boards (one Intel, one Asus), a KM400, a > KM266 and a KT266A > (on which my PVR-500 currently resides)... > > > > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:39:49 -0800 (PST), Jason > Knisley > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yah. I thought that that might be the case.... > It's > >> worked perfectly in the two dual Xeon machines > that I > >> have. The production backend is a dual Xeon 2.2 > and > >> the only linux Xeon I have.. I might just have to > yank > >> it from the rack and use it on the desk for a > while > >> until after we get vbi slicing and scaling > completely > >> going. > >> > >> Eh well. :P > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> > >> --- Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> At the risk of being completely flamed here, in > my > >>> experience the PVR 500 > >>> wont work with most VIA chipsets. > >>> I have tried it in a ASROCK K7 AMD2400 board and > a > >>> VIA EPIA and both did > >>> exactly the same as yours. > >>> > >>> It had nothing to do with the power supply as > has > >>> been highlighted in a > >>> different post. Read the recommended hardware > >>> requirements and it will tell > >>> you: > >>> Processor requirements: PentiumR IV processor > 1.2GHz > >>> or faster for TV pause > >>> with full screen playback > >>> > >>> I changed to a P4 3Ghz Intel and all is good. > Sorry > >>> to be the bearer of bad > >>> news. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Grant > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > >>> Behalf Of Jason Knisley > >>> Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2005 9:00 p.m. > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: [ivtv-devel] PVR500 & VIA > >>> > >>> Hey all, > >>> > >>> Well, I've hit a new little snag. I've been > >>> shuffling around machines since > >>> I got the PATA card, and I've set up this Athlon > XP > >>> 1700 as my test machine > >>> for myth and the PVR500... > >>> > >>> However, when I tried 0.3.2i, I got about two > >>> seconds worth of data before > >>> the machine reset. > >>> > >>> And I tried f, and I got about 20 seconds worth > of > >>> digitally noisy data > >>> before the machine reset. > >>> > >>> then I tried megapatched e, and I got variable > >>> lengths of noisy data before > >>> the machine reset. > >>> > >>> I recall seeing somewhere that there was an > issue > >>> with motherboards with VIA > >>> chipsets... Is this actually true? I also tried > >>> turning off preemption, so I > >>> have an 8kstacks uniprocessor kernel without > >>> preemption and it just simply > >>> resets while decoding. > >>> > >>> Anyone got any ideas? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Jason > > -- > Jarod Wilson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
