Chris Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am > not happy with the way the driver is programmed being very ambiguous and > not open to us developing on top of this code easily, little help has been > given, it looks like an actually great interface and rather advanced, if it > is solid, else we need help changing it, which there's some dynamic generation > of code we need access to (Ulf???).
You know, that autogenerated code really looks like parsed info from a datasheet. Whatever datasheet was used has more information (more defined registers) than the ones I've seen, though. It certainly has more debug data in it than any kernel driver needs. (Most of cx25840-registers.c's strings should be in userspace, and that's probably the bulk of the driver.) -- Tyler Trafford ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
