Axel Thimm wrote: > Tyer Trafford wrote: > >> The tuner/tveeprom modules packed in with ivtv seem to cause confusion >> in addition to duplicated work. I would think that (at least for the >> 'experimental' 0.3 branch), it would not be out of line to just >> require people who need a tuner type not in their current kernel to >> install a v4l2 snapshot. > > I agree with Tyler, we should try and push as much as possible back to > v4l. OTOH having a copy of these in the developement tree is good as > often new tuners need to be added etc.
The tuner has its own development tree though, and getting updates into that can't be any harder than getting them into the one in ivtv, right? -- Tyler Trafford ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list ivtv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
