It might be the kernel itself: that too has a memcpy function. Oh, never 
mind. It works :-)

        Hans

On Monday 02 January 2006 22:35, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 22:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hans,
> >
> > That did it - can you explain the difference between the two
> > functions? The function prototype is not easily found on google. I
> > would like to know the cause.
>
> memcpy_toio is a kernel function which copies memory to so-called I/O
> memory, which is memory from another board (such as the PVR card)
> mapped through the PCI bus. I bet that the new gcc compiler inlines
> memcpy to use 64-bit memory copies for the amd64, but the PCI-bus
> cannot handle 64-bit memory transfers. memcpy_toio behaves well in
> this case.
>
> I never saw it because I'm still using gcc-3.4 on my amd64 box. My
> 32-bit environment has been updated to gcc-4, but that's 32-bit so it
> works there as well.
>
> > How do we go about filing a bug report?
>
> Nothing. I've fixed it in the ivtv-0.4 branch and in ivtv-0.5 head.
> It will be in the next release.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
>       Hans
>
> > Michael
> >
> > Quoting Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > OK, I thought so.
> > >
> > > Now for the interesting part:
> > >
> > > In ivtv-firmware.c, in the load_fw_direct inside
> > > CONFIG_FW_LOADER, replace the two memcpy statements by
> > > memcpy_toio and let me know if it now works. If my guess is
> > > correct it will work now. You can put back the audio firmware, by
> > > the way.
> > >
> > >   Hans
> > >
> > > On Monday 02 January 2006 21:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hans,
> > > >
> > > >   I'm afraid that renaming the audio firmware doesn't make any
> > > > difference. Is there someway of ensuring that it is being
> > > > loaded? The debug messages in dmesg do not explicitly state
> > > > that the audio firmware is loaded in either 0.4.0/0.4.1/0.4.2.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > On Monday 02 January 2006 20:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > Hans,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wasn't able to apply the patch ( I'm a newbie w/ linux )
> > > > > > so I just modified the source with the information
> > > > > > contained in your file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > no hotplug gives:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 1348.171567] ivtv0: loaded
> > > > > > /lib/modules/v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw firmware (262144 bytes) [
> > > > > > 1348.423225] ivtv0: firmware sum = 0084a9cb
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hotplug gives:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 1865.847204] ivtv0: loaded v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw firmware
> > > > > > (262144 bytes, sum = 0084a9cb)
> > > > > > [ 1866.098870] ivtv0: firmware sum = 00206879
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is very interesting, it loads the firmware in
> > > > > > load_fw_direct and then has the incorrect firmware in
> > > > > > ivtv_enc_firmware_copy. The memcpy was successful, it did
> > > > > > not return NULL(I checked).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could something else be overwriting this variable? Another
> > > > > > thread perhaps?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm willing to continue debugging but need a little help.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you move the v4l-cx25840.fw to another name? The only
> > > > > thing I can think of right now is that the load of that
> > > > > firmware disturbs the load of this firmware. So by moving
> > > > > v4l-cx25840.fw out of the way the cx25840 no longer can
> > > > > interfere. If that makes no difference, then try to rmmod
> > > > > ivtv followed by modprobe ivtv (since cx25840 was already
> > > > > loaded that too excludes any interference of cx25840).
> > > > >
> > > > >       Hans
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Quoting Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > Michael,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've attached a patch for ivtv-firmware.c. I'm curious
> > > > > > > what the results will be. To be continued tomorrow...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   Hans
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday 02 January 2006 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hans,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your guess was bang on - reverting to the "old way" of
> > > > > > > > loading the firmware results in success. Something in
> > > > > > > > the hotplug is causing grief.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you can give me a hand with the C, I can attempt the
> > > > > > > > summations that you have requested. It would be nice to
> > > > > > > > get to the bottom of this one.. I'm probably not the
> > > > > > > > only one that has run into this problem.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Quoting Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > > > On Monday 02 January 2006 00:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hans,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I've performed the operations as requested, and
> > > > > > > > > > achieve the same result - I assume this removes
> > > > > > > > > > zero padding on the firmware file?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > correct
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [  307.521854] ivtv0: loaded v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw
> > > > > > > > > > firmware (262144 bytes) [  307.753271] ivtv0
> > > > > > > > > > warning: Encoder mailbox not found [  307.784732]
> > > > > > > > > > ivtv0 warning: Decoder mailbox not found [ 
> > > > > > > > > > 307.784735] ivtv0: Error locating firmware. [ 
> > > > > > > > > > 307.791075] ivtv0: Error -12 on initialization [ 
> > > > > > > > > > 307.791084] ivtv: probe of 0000:02:06.0 failed with
> > > > > > > > > > error -12 [ 307.791090] ivtv:
> > > > > > > > > > ====================  END INIT IVTV
> > > > > > > > > > ====================
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > To be certain that the firmware was correct, I
> > > > > > > > > > reloaded 0.4.0 using the shortened firmware file
> > > > > > > > > > and was able to watch tv once again.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I believe we have ruled out the firmware.. could
> > > > > > > > > > there be something in ivtv 0.4.1/2 that is causing
> > > > > > > > > > the grief? Is there some means of enabling more
> > > > > > > > > > verbose debug messages? I don't mind recompiling...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well, ivtv-0.4.1 switched to the hotplug mechanism.
> > > > > > > > > My guess the problem is with that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Edit ivtv-firmware.c, look for CONFIG_FW_LOADER and
> > > > > > > > > replace that #if with #if 0. Do the same in
> > > > > > > > > ivtv-driver.h and cx25840.h.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Recompile, install and test. If it now works again,
> > > > > > > > > then it is the new hotplug stuff that breaks things.
> > > > > > > > > But why don't I get the same problems? Weird.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If it is hotplug related and if you are handy with C,
> > > > > > > > > then can you perhaps do some tests? I was thinking of
> > > > > > > > > hacking ivtv-firmware.c so that the firmware load
> > > > > > > > > routines so a simple sum of all the bytes in the
> > > > > > > > > firmware and then show the grand total when done. I'd
> > > > > > > > > be very interested to see if there are any difference
> > > > > > > > > between the hotplug and non-hotplug cases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > ivtv-users mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ivtv-users mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > ivtv-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ivtv-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ivtv-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to