It's already in the 0.4 svn. The next stable 0.4 release will contain
this change.
Hans
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 21:46, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> Hans, are you going to incorporate this patch into 0.4.x?
>
> Kirk
>
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday 06 February 2006 22:45, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> I finally had time to look at the reported Samsung tuner problems
> >> and I discovered that I had forgotten to take a NTSC offset into
> >> account. The attached patch is for tuner.c from ivtv-0.4.2 and
> >> should correct all problems. Please test!
> >>
> >> I've also committed the change to ivtv-0.4 in subversion, so you
> >> can also you that for testing.
> >>
> >> Please let me know any test results asap as I also have to fix
> >> this before the 2.6.16 kernel is released.
> >>
> >> Hans
> >
> > Thanks to all the people who reported their test results. The new
> > tuner specification looks to be OK. The reported problems with
> > certain channels all are away from the frequency band boundaries as
> > far as I can tell so they do not appear to be related to this tuner
> > spec.
> >
> > In my experience the PVR-500 is much more sensitive to the antenna
> > signal quality compared to the PVR-350 and this is even more true
> > for tuner 2 (extra interference?). A good antenna amplifier fixed
> > the problems for me.
> >
> > Anyway, the fixed Samsung tuner specification should be part of
> > 2.6.16 (I've mailed the patch against the latest 2.6.16-rc2 to the
> > v4l-dvb maintainer for inclusion in the next batch of patches for
> > 2.6.16).
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ivtv-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
