On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:02:56AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> I'm going to release 0.4.3 this week (I'll try to do this tonight). It 
> includes all tuner patches and Axel's make patch. Once that's released 
> then please test with that new version.

I jumped in the cold water and did a 0.4 branch rebuild of the ivtv
rpms. E.g. the packages contain both the lowband fixes and build the
tuner modules for 2.6.15. These are build -102 and are currently only
to be found on dl.atrpms.net, not the website, yet.

BTW for FC5's 2.6.15 based kernel branch 0.4 builds fail with

  CC [M]  /builddir//ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.o
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1855: error: unknown field 'owner' 
specified in initializer
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1855: warning: initialization makes integer 
from pointer without a cast
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1857: error: unknown field 'name' specified 
in initializer
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1857: warning: initialization makes integer 
from pointer without a cast
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1859: error: unknown field 'flags' 
specified in initializer
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1859: error: 'I2C_DF_NOTIFY' undeclared 
here (not in a function)
/builddir/ivtv-0.4.2/driver/tuner.c:1866: error: 'I2C_CLIENT_ALLOW_USE' 
undeclared here (not in a function)

Is this already that close to 2.6.16 to start using 0.6? What's the
recommended route?

> If it still gives problems then contact me off-list with a good
> description of what's going wrong (please give me the frequencies
> rather than channel numbers, frequencies are unambiguous). If
> necessary I'll then give you the instructions on how to make the i2c
> logs.
> 
>       Hans
> 
> On Wednesday 15 February 2006 05:35, David Cuka wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > I collected logs under Hans' expert direction; it was not that hard
> > to do but someone on the dev team who can interpret the results would
> > need to give directions on what logs to collect.   Basically, I was
> > in the same position as you; willing to help out in whatever way... 
> > You could try reposting on the dev list.  Maybe it would be
> > instructive to have another set of logs and then compare the two...
> >
> > Overall it sounds like some people are having problems and other not
> > having problems which makes me wonder if there are other differences
> > in the cards or in the configuration.  The logs I collected were on
> > us-bcast and NTSC standards, I don't know if that would make a
> > difference.
> >
> > Ironically, I'm still using 0.4.0 because of the initial bug where
> > the upper frequencies were off;  I've not had time to upgrade my
> > install with the latest greatest, but, the only thing I am missing is
> > FOX which is not a great loss.  :)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:58 -0500, Andrew Dodd wrote:
> > > Quoting Doug Butterworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > I too am affected by the bad lowband performance on tuner 0 of
> > > > the PVR500. Thanks to this list I was able to get the patch and
> > > > compile the kernal modules to get it to even work in the first
> > > > place so I could even figure out that I am affected.  Thank you
> > > > all for that.  For a while, I thought I or my box was going
> > > > crazy.
> > > >
> > > > Either way, I would be more than willing to help out anyway that
> > > > I can with finding a solution to lowband issue.  If anyone can
> > > > tell me how to gather i2c logs from the card in Windows I can try
> > > > to do it as I have a windows machine laying around.  Though i
> > > > have a feeling it isn't an easy process. I am sure I am not the
> > > > only one willing to offer assistance, but I just wanted to say it
> > > > here.
> > >
> > > Yup, as I mentioned before, also count me in as far as obtaining
> > > some logs under
> > > Windows.  I know it is possible (and that's how we have the initial
> > > Samsung tuner support), but I don't know how.  Dave Cuka, are you
> > > listening?  :)
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ivtv-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
> >
> > End of Mail
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpMEEqIK0fcm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to