Don Gafford wrote: >Bill, I asked this before, but can you answer? > >Is there any reason you are using FC3? I have had good luck with FC4, >and would recommend that. I don't know if you are stuck on FC3 for some >reason or not. I am just trying to help. > >Are you compiling or using the RPMs? I have been able to get this all >setup with little issue while using the RPMs after adding the testing >ATRPMS branch. > >--------------------- > >Thanks, Don. I've tried multiple variations on modprobe.conf with no >success. After reading the info in the IVTV site, I removed all the >alias entries as per their recommendation for 0.4.2, but the problem >persists. > >-Bill > >_______________________________________________ >ivtv-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users > >_______________________________________________ >ivtv-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users > > > Yes, you did ask, sorry about that. I'm trying to migrate an existing system from a bttv input to a PVR-350. I don't want to upgrade the OS unless I have to... I've had issues in the past trying to do a Fedora Core upgrade of a working system, so I usually don't do so unless it required. I know there are woking FC3 boxes out there, I'm just trying to learn the recepie :-).
Ans yes also to your second question, I am using the RPMs. I'm installing via yum from atrpms stable branch. Would the testing branch work better? I tried enabling testing once a long time ago and had issues, but it was before I got all this working (FC3/bttv/myth) in the first place. Thanks for your help, -Bill _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
