On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:20, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 04:09, Doug Butterworth wrote:
> > I just applied the update as well and went through each channel on
> > both tuners.
> >
> > The image quality on both tuners is now good and at least match
> > each other. However, I will second Lonnie's comment about the
> > cross- hatching of channels.
> >
> > I found that most channels are not affected. On those channels
> > that are affected, some channels are worse than others. Channel 39
> > (313.250 MHz) seems a lot worse than all of them. On that channel,
> > instead of just cross hatch-lines, it looks more like flickering
> > cross hatch lines. A little more annoying.
> >
> > But back on the good note, both tuners are now at least watchable
> > and recordable. Thank you for your hard work and time Hans to get
> > this far. Let me know if you would like a more detailed list of
> > exactly which channels I am seeing the cross-hatching and if you
> > want any video samples.
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for testing. What I like to know is if the channels with
> cross-hatching are also the channels that look good *without* this
> patch. In other words, are bad channels now OK and formerly good
> channels now bad?
BTW: it would be great if someone can compare the ivtv results with the
Windows driver. Does the Windows driver also show cross-hatching?
Hans
_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
