Hans Verkuil wrote:

> On Thursday 14 September 2006 20:39, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 09:25 -0700, Jon Larson wrote:
>>     
>>> I'm confused.. Is this likely to be a bug with the hardware,
>>> software, or just my setup? Are there others on this list to have a
>>> "Samsung TCPN 2121P30A" working fine, or is everyone having trouble
>>> with that tuner?
>>>       
>> I have a Phillips based PVR-500 and the Samsung 2121P30A (2221P30A
>> after the patch) based PVR-500.  Between the quality patch from Hans,
>> and a Motorola cable amp, I now have just as good (or at least real
>> close) quality on the Samsung as on the Phillips.  The patch had made
>> a difference, but the cable amp made the biggest difference.  It
>> appears that the Samsung tuners are much more sensitive to signal
>> levels (ie. they need more).
>>
>> I got a Motorola BDA-100S1 from Ebay on someone's advice (I think
>> from this list).  It's the first cable amp that has actually made a
>> difference... even for my "regular" TVs.
>>
>> Lonnie Borntreger
>>     
>
> Jon, you said that you applied the Samsung tuner patch and that you saw 
> no difference. Are you sure that you have applied the patch correctly 
> and that it is actually being used? It sounds very much like you are 
> still running with the wrong version.
>
>       Hans
>   
I followed the instructions
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03909.html)
and didn't get any errors, but I'm not really sure what commands I could
use to test for the patch once everything is compiled. Suggestions?

Jon



_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to