On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 18:51 -0800, Pete wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:08:06 -0500, Andy Walls
> > I never properly reviewed or tested this patch, but I beleive it has > > promise: > > > > http://ivtvdriver.org/pipermail/ivtv-devel/2010-July/006547.html > > > > Feedback from anyone with experiencing symptoms with the time to test > > it, is welcome. Although I'm not even sure if it will apply cleanly > > anymore, I hope it does. If it doesn't, let me know, and I'll clean it > > up. (my time this weekend for linux stuff is scarce.) > > Yes! I applied this patch shortly after receiving your message, > and can confirm that my PVR-500 is now happily recording in DMA > mode, with both tuners simultaneously, and the card no longer > locks up. I still get DMA ERRORs in the logs, but the ones with > status bits 00000011 that were previously fatal, are not anymore. > > I'd strongly advocate applying the modified error handling patches > to the baseline ivtv-irq.c. Pete, I'll try and push it forward this weekend. Mike, can you provide a "Signed-off-by: " line for your patch you provided here: http://ivtvdriver.org/pipermail/ivtv-devel/2010-July/006547.html http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Development:_Submitting_Patches#Sign_your_work > Thank you for pointing it out, and of > course to Mike for posting the patch. Pete, Note that Mike's email pointed to some speculation by me: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/users/40943#40943 that I made in response to some guy name "Pete". Pete had made an interesting observation about the difference between 0x11 and 0x13 DMA ERROR codes in the first place: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/users/40941#40941 ;) > --Pete Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
