[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jing Xue updated IVY-561:
-------------------------

    Description: Currently it's possible to use poms with a filesystem resolver 
if you specify the pom extension in your "ivy" pattern, instead of using [ext]. 
However since all the AbstractResourceResolver subclasses can be m2compatible 
and hence basically maven2 aware, it makes sense to make any 
AbstractResourceResolver support usePoms.  It would also be more obvious than 
using the aforementioned ivy pattern.  (was: Currently it's possible to use 
poms with a filesystem resolver if you specify the pom extension
in your "ivy" pattern, instead of using [ext]. However since all the
AbstractResourceResolver subclasses can be m2compatible and hence
basically maven2 aware, it makes sense to make any
AbstractResourceResolver support usePoms.  It would also be more obvious than 
using the aforementioned ivy pattern.)

> Make all AbstractResourceResolver's support usePOMs
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IVY-561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-561
>             Project: Ivy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-1
>            Reporter: Jing Xue
>
> Currently it's possible to use poms with a filesystem resolver if you specify 
> the pom extension in your "ivy" pattern, instead of using [ext]. However 
> since all the AbstractResourceResolver subclasses can be m2compatible and 
> hence basically maven2 aware, it makes sense to make any 
> AbstractResourceResolver support usePoms.  It would also be more obvious than 
> using the aforementioned ivy pattern.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to