On 11/2/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I am sure Apache will gladly host the Ivy repository. What is delaying us is that the fax with the software grant from Xavier did not make its way to Jim Jagielski.
Yes I'll send the software grant again tomorrow, hope it will be ok this time, I don't know why it was badly received. To be sure we won't lose too much time, I'll also send it (and my ICLA) by snail mail. For hosting the repository, if it can be hosted at apache it's great. There's also the solution to host it on svn as we do for the sandbox. Anyway, the current ivy repository is rather old, we tried to have the policy to add only validated stuff, but it takes too much time and we didn't manage to get a true community process to validate files. The problem if we put non validated files is that: - people can't be confident on the repository quality - you then have to modify files from time to time, and this is a very bad practice for people already using stuff in the repository. But I think this could be the object of a discussion on its own, and is not directly related to the repository hosting question. Xavier Regards,
Antoine -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:30 -0800 (PST) Von: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: SVN repo > If Apache won't host the ivy-repository, we can always place them > elsewhere. > If I'm not mistaken, maven doesn't has a repository at apache either? > > Maarten > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2006 6:27:41 PM > Subject: Re: SVN repo > > I guess a related question is what are we going to do about > repositories. Ivy defaults to ivyrep for now, doesnt it? Hmm. I wonder > what the repo people would say to ivy content on their filesystem. > > -steve > > > > > >
