On 11/13/06, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
easyproglife wrote: > Changing packages names IMO is a major change. I don't think 1.5 is a > good > candidate for such a version. > [...] > I don't know how many extension to ivy have been written so far, but > please > don't break their code at 1.x branch. I would not bother because nearly every release where you tried to use the API directly was broken with the next release simply because the architecture did not allow any difference between what's public and what's private so any little change was actually breaking something.
I agree. That's unnecessary to add ourselves more constraints than necessary at
this stage.
+1 Xavier -- stephane
